Reponte v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably State v. Fry (1979), State v. Merino (1996)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Johnson v. Zerbst · United States v. Wade · North Carolina v. Alford · United State v. Morgan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We stated in Wong v. Among, 52 Haw. [420,] 425, 477 P.2d [630,] 634 [(1970)]: “A plea of guilty in itself is a conviction and simultaneous waiver of several important constitutional guarantees— the privilege against self incrimination, a trial by jury, and the confrontation of one’s accusers. Such a waiver is not constitutionally acceptable unless made voluntarily and with full understanding of the consequences. (Citations omitted.)” The standard for determining the constitutional validity of guilty pleas “was and remains whether the plea represents a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternate courses of action open to the defendant.” North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kimsel“an accused need not be informed prior to the acceptance of his guilty plea about every conceivable collateral effect the conviction might have.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Kealoha.“A waiver is ordinarily an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hernandez.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.