Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Haw. 365 - State v. Napeahi

State v. Napeahi’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably State v. Estrada (1987), State v. Apao (1978)

70 state decisions

29019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Davis v. Alaska · Pointer v. Texas · Douglas v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f there is a reasonable possibility that the matter complained of might have contributed to the conviction, the error must give rise to a reversal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “constitutional error will in fact be held harmless, `the court must be able to declare a belief that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt[.]'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In our opinion, an instrument, within the clear import of the provisions of Section 708-840, does not attain the character of a dangerous instrument unless “in the manner it [the instrument] is used or threatened to be used is capable of producing death or serious bodily injury.” The statute creates factual criteria requiring the prosecution to adduce evidence meeting the criteria. It is then clearly a question offact for the jury to resolve whether the prosecution has proved an essential element of the crime of which defendant is tried.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.