Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Haw. 405 - Pickering v. State

Pickering v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
4
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

8 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc. (1993), Camara v. Agsalud (1984)

8 district · 56 state decisions

29019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grand Trunk Ry Co of Canada v. Ives · Rodrigues v. State · Abraham v. S. E. Onorato Garages · Rogers v. State · Aku v. Lewis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no entry” sign outside, closed the door, and was alone in the restroom cleaning the stalls. An unknown male assaulted Donna by fondling her and threatening to use a knife, which she did not see. Because of the assailant’s extremely intoxicated condition, Donna managed to push him away and escape. 2 . Plaintiffs also attached reports from two additional incidents. These incidents, however, occurred after Donna was assaulted on March 27, 1988. 3 . In addition, we recognize that " '[i]ssues of negligence are ordinarily not susceptible of summary adjudication’ by the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he duty of the State is to design and construct its highways in such a manner as to make them reasonably safe for their intended uses, and thereafter to maintain them in a reasonably safe condition.... It is not required to exercise extraordinary care to guard against unusual accidents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.