¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶2The question made in this case is whether a deposition, to suppress which no motion was ever made, the witness testifying to the value of his luggage, consisting mostly of articles of wearing apparel, is competent as evidence of such value; which hardly rises to the dignity of a question. Lundberg v. Mackenhauser, 4 Ill. App. 603.
¶3The judgment is affirmed.