Richards v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis
1896
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1941
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Colorado Coal & Iron Co. v. United States · Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co. · Leviston v.Ryan · Bradley v. Parkhurst · Carman v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There was no proof whatever as to the payment of taxes. If the taxes were not in fact paid, and if Richards in fact held a tax-sale certificate for the requisite time and paid the balance of the purchase-money, he was entitled to a patent which would absolutely cut off all interest of the plaintiff in the land.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffith v. Richards
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.