Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 KAN 508 - Garrett v. Struble

Garrett v. Struble’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
June 1928
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 1928

11 state decisions

601896190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Trowbridge · Repine v. McPherson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “■“If there is a total failure to state in the notice any material matter required by section 74 of the Civil Code., the service is void; but if there is not an entire omission of such material matter and it is inferentially or insufficiently set forth, the notice is merely voidable, and not void. Following this rule, we hold that the notice in the case of Garrett v. Struble was irregular, defective, and voidable, but that it was not void, and therefore must be held sufficient as against collateral attack”— and reversed the judgment of the lower court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.