Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 KAN 663 - Bolinger v. Brake

Bolinger v. Brake’s Empirical Analysis

1897

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1985

7 state decisions

201897190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dale v. Shively · Scoffins v. Grandstaff · Smith v. Davis · O'Meara v. McDaniel · Hammerslough v. Hackett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think, however, that there is a broad distinction between the two covenants, which the courts cannot properly ignore. The covenant of seizin is of the present tense, and if the covenantor has not the title, there is a breach of the covenant as soon as it is made. It is strictly a covenant for title. The covenant of warranty is of the future tense, and binds the covenantor to defend the title when it shall be assailed, and to make good the loss, within certain limitations, which may then be sustained. It is essentially a covenant against the loss of possession, and a right of action upon it does not accrue until the covenantee is disturbed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.