Commonwealth v. Mulvey’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
2 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Latimore · Mickens v. Taylor · Alegata v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. a Juvenile · Commonwealth v. Sholley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of disorderly conduct if, with purpose to cause public inconvenience, annoyance or alarm, or recklessly creating a risk thereof, he ... engages in fighting or threatening, or in violent or tumultuous behavior; or ... creates a hazardous or physically offensive condition by any act which serves no legitimate purpose of the actor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“behavior that has an impact only upon members of the police force is significantly different from that affecting other citizens in [part because] it is an unfortunate but inherent part of a police officer's job to be in the presence of distraught individuals”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“people could have seen or heard the defendant from any place of public access, such as a nearby sidewalk, publicly used path or road, shopping area or other neighborhood facility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.