Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Md. App. 531 - Foster & Kleiser v. Baltimore County

57 Md. App. 531 - Foster & Kleiser v. Baltimore County’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
June 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2009

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

80198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. Fenton Realty Corp. · Dillon v. AFBIC Development Corp. · Maryland Supreme Corp. v. Blake Co. · Downing Development Corp. v. Brazelton · 57 Md. App. 502 - Mayor of Ocean City v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “could not have accepted [the county's] 'offer' without further action by the County.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “. . . Any contract . . . must be approved by the County Council before it is executed if the contract is (1) For the purpose of real or leasehold property where the purchase price of the property is in excess of $5,000. . . Balto.Co.Code 1978 (1982 Cum.Supp.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.