Mitchell v. Chisholm

Decided May 4, 1894

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1894-05-04

Appeal by plaintiff, William B. Mitchell, from an order of the District Court of Stearns County, L. L. Baxter, J., made June 24, 1893, denying his motion for a new trial. The plaintiff acquired tax titles to the east half of the southeast quarter of section eight (8), T. 122, R. 32, in Stearns County and sold it to defendant, John Chisholm, for $400, and took his notes.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1920

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1894-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Canty, J.

¶1This case being a part of the controversy in the foregoing case, ante, p. 148, (58 N. W. 873,) and involving the same questions, the order appealed from is reversed, and a new trial granted.

¶2(Opinion published 58 N. W. 874.)

¶3Application for reargument denied June 5, 1894.