Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 Ohio St. 2d 71

State v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1979

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1979-03-21

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 1980

Relies on Miller v. California · State v. Burgun

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1979-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed on authority of and for the reasons stated in State v. Burgum, (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 354, wherein this court held, in- paragraph one of the syllabus, that “R. C. 2907.-01(F), which .'sets forth the definition of ‘obscenity/ is neither unconstitutionally overbroád nor void for vagueness when it is authoritatively construed to incorporate the guidelines prescribed in Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15.”

¶2 Judgment reversed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, Keefe, P. Brown, Sweeney, Potter and Holmes, JJ., concur. Keefe, J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for W. Brown, J. Potter, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Locher, J.
/57/ohiost2d/71 · .json · Public domain