Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Okla. 449 - Oates v. Freeman

Oates v. Freeman’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
3
states following
January 1962
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 1962

1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

110191519201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘The contract or agreement to convey within the inhibition of this statute (Act of April 26, 1906) is not to be inferred, as we understand it, from the mere fact of the execution of a deed during the period of restrictions, and placing that deed of record and the execution of a deed to the same party for the same land after the restrictions have been removed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““And every deed executed before, or for the making of which a contract or agreement was entered into before the removal of restrictions be, and the same is hereby declared void.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.