Hansen v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
4 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 1960
4 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mansfield v. Hill · Morris v. Ward · Bunn v. Lindsay · Green v. Marks · Bullene v. Hiatt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this case plaintiff was not the owner of the premises at the time the execution was levied, and therefore she could not then, or thereafter, assert the right of a homestead subsequently acquired as superior to the lien of the judgment.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Paulson v. Hurlburt““The homestead of any family shall be exempt from judicial sale for the satisfaction of any liability hereafter contracted, or for- the satisfaction of any judgment hereafter obtained on such debt.” Session Laws 1893, p. 93.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.