Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 OR 446 - Watson v. McLench

Watson v. McLench’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 1947
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1947

7 state decisions

301910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ametrano v. . Downs · Graham v. Burch · Hattersley v. Bissett · Le Clare v. Thibault

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ Though a bond, covenant, or agreement made for a valuable consideration to convey real property, specified in a last will previously made, is not deemed a revocation of such prior devise (§ 5552, B. & C. Comp.), the voluntary conveyance for a valuable consideration by Mrs. McLench of the 101 acres of land, which she had antecedently devised to her son, took that real property out of the operation of her last will (§ 5573, B. & C. Comp.), which testament was thereby impliedly revoked pro tanto.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.