Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 ORAPP 140 - State v. Richards

State v. Richards’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “after a car break-in was reported). In light of all of those considerations, we conclude that Waterbury's suspicion that defendant had committed unlawful entry into a motor vehicle was objectively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances existing at the time of the stop. Consequently, we reverse and remand. Reversed and remanded. Article I, section 9, provides, in part:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “all other respects and his proximity in time and place to the crime”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.