¶1The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed for the reasons given by the learned judge specially presiding in his opinion overruling the defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment and for new trial, and the record is remitted to the court of quarter sessions of Allegheny county with direction that the judgment be fully carried into effect, and to that end it is ordered that the defendant forthwith appear in that court and that he be by that court committed to cpmply with such part of his sentence as had not been served and complied with at the time this appeal was made a supersedeas.
57 Pa. Super. 154
Commonwealth v. Lavery
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 1914
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1914-05-14
Appeal, No. 110, April T., 1914, by defendants, from judgment of Q. S. Allegheny Co., Sept. Sessions, 1913, No. 289, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. W. J. Lavery and Leo Kennedy. Indictment for an offense under the Act of June 7, 1911, P. L. 698. Before Reed, P. J., specially presiding. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty.
Affirmed · Decided 1914-05-14