Neal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Kirby v. Illinois · Moran v. Burbine · McNeil v. Wisconsin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial court concluded that Neal had initiated the contacts. [The supreme court] discerned] no basis to overrule the court’s factual finding. A transcript of the suppression hearing reveal[ed] that the trial court was aware of the caselaw involved and appropriately examined and applied the law.”). 3 . See Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836, 843 (¶ 16) (Miss.2005). 4 . See Neal, 57 So.3d at 1277 (¶ 14). 5 . As our caselaw holds,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Findings by a trial judge that a defendant confessed voluntarily, and that such confession is admissible[,] are findings of fact. As long as the trial judge applies the correct legal standards, his decision will not be reversed on appeal unless it is manifestly in error, or is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.