Cassista v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 392 So. 2d 54 - Jolly v. State · 484 So. 2d 1239 - Harich v. State · 934 So. 2d 1226 - Koile v. State · 872 So. 2d 230 - Tompkins v. State · Williams v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“On occasion, an offender’s sentence expiration date might be relevant if for example, the offender, while committed to a state correctional facility, is temporarily transported to a hospital, for treatment, or to a county jail to face urn-elated charges. If that offender’s state prison sentence expires while he or she is temporarily residing in a hospital or county jail, we would have no difficulty in concluding that the offender was constructively in a state prison facility when his sentence expired for PRR purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.