Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 SW2D 607 - Radoff v. Guardian Trust Co.

Radoff v. Guardian Trust Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1952
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chipman v. . Palmer · Little Schuylkill Navigation, Railroad & Coal Co. v. Richards's Administrator · 48 Tex. Civ. App. 349 - Sun Company v. Wyatt · Barnes v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well established in this state, and supported by almost universal authority, that an action at law for damages for torts cannot be maintained against several defendants jointly, when each acted independently of the others and there was no concert or unity of design between them. In such a case the tort of each defendant is several when committed, and it does not become joint because afterwards its consequences, united with the consequences of several other torts committed by other persons in producing damages. Under such circumstances, each tort-feasor is liable only for the part of the injury or damages caused by his own wrong; that is, where a person contributes to an injury along with others, he must respond in damages, but if he acts independently, and not in concert of action with other persons in causing such injury, he is liable only for the damages which directly and proximately result from his own act, and the fact that it may be difficult to define the damages caused by the wrongful act of each person who independently contributed to the final result does not affect the rule. Sun Co. v. Wyatt, 48 Tex. Civ. App., 349 , 107 S.W. 934 ; 38 Cyc. 484; 26 R.C.L. 766.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.