Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

57 S.W.3d 354

Kloster v. Kloster

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 2001

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2001-10-09

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2003

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2George J. Kloster, Jr. (“Husband”) appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County. Husband asserts the trial court erred in failing to quash service in that the special process server lacked valid authority to serve him and finding that the antenuptial agreement entered into between him and Janet R. Kloster (‘Wife”) was unenforceable, unconscionable, and lacked sufficient consideration. We find no error and affirm.

¶3No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, furnished the parties with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/57/sw3d/354 · .json · Public domain