Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 TC 735 - Robinson v. Commissioner

Robinson v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
August 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably Frieling v. Commissioner (1983), Abeles v. Commissioner (1988)

4 federal appellate ·

29019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Badger Materials, Inc. v. Commissioner · Knollwood Memorial Gardens v. Commissioner · Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Commissioner · Gatto v. Commissioner · Whitmer v. Lucas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The statute of limitations is a defense in bar and not a plea to the jurisdiction of this Court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The statute of limitations is a defense in bar and not a plea to the jurisdiction of this Court. Badger Materials, Inc., 40 T.C. 1061 (1963). In establishing this defense, the petitioner ‘must make a prima facie case, which ordinarily means proof of the filing of the statutory return and the expiration of the statutory period; whereupon the respondent must go forward with countervailing proof.’ E. J. Lorie, 21 B.T.A. 612, 614 (1930); see Knollwood Memorial Gardens, 46 T.C. 764, 792 (1966); Anne Gatto, 20 T.C. 830 (1953); C. A. Reis, 1 T.C. 9 (1942); M. A. Nicholson, et al., 22 B.T.A. 744, 746 (1931); Bonwit Teller & Co., 10 B.T.A. 1300 (1928). Thus, if the petitioners plead and prove that they have not received a notice of deficiency before the running of the period of limitations, it is clear that they have met their burden of proof and that, the respondent must then show that the running of the period was in some way suspended. See James A. Rogers, 57 T.C. 711 (1972); T. W. Warner Co., 19 B.T.A. 872 (1930); Bernicedale Coal Co., 16 B.T.A. 696 (1929).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.