Keith v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1998
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schwartz v. Johnson · Standridge v. Godsey · Memphis Street Railway Co. v. Johnson · 20 N.J. Super. 180 - Petrone v. Margolis · Hicks v. Herbert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ 2] We take up next, on its merits, the question of whether the trial judge ruled correctly, when on defendant’s motion for a new trial, he undertook to correct what he concluded had been an error, and granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. The fact that the trial judge was enough doubtful about the matter to overrule the motion for directed verdict indicates to some extent, at least, that reasonable minds might differ as to whether or not such motion should be granted, and the subsequent fact that the jury to whom the case was submitted did in fact disagree, clearly indicates that reasonable minds did disagree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. Buckspan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.