57 Va. App. 731 - Young v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on California v. Hodari D. · Knowles v. Iowa · State v. Oquendo · 24 Va. App. 190 - Moreno v. Moreno · Overbee v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Though inconclusive by itself, the statement ‘ you are under arrest ’ nonetheless constitutes evidence of ‘an intent on the part of the arresting officer to take the person into custody and a corresponding understanding by the person arrested that he is in custody.’ " ( quoting State v. Rocheleau , 117 N.H. 792 , 378 A.2d 1381, 1383 ( 1977 ) ) ) ; see also United States v. Savage, No. 07-550-06 , 2012 WL 5881852 , at ( E.D. Pa. Nov. 20, 2012 ) ( "Being advised that you are under arrest is perhaps the most significant factor in determining that a suspect is in custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.