Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 WASH 178 - In re Pine Street

In re Pine Street’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1935
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1935

8 state decisions

60191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schuchard v. City of Seattle · State ex rel. Donofrio v. Humes · Seattle v. Meteor Land Co. · In re the Improvement of Elliott Avenue & Milwaukee Street

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is true that only a small part of the total cost of the improvement was finally assessed against the general fund, but, so far as the record shows, there was no obligation to Assess the general fund at all. The whole improvement, notwithstanding, might have been made at the expense of the property specially benefited, without reference to the general benefits.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.