Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 WASH 264 - Harstad v. Olson

Harstad v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 1956
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1956

3 state decisions

1019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Anything that would show a partial payment, whether before or after the contract was reduced to writing, was material, and has never, so far as we have been able to inform ourselves, been held to be a variation of the terms of a written contract by parol. It is not a question of contract— upon that the parties are agreed — but of payment, or a bar to recovery.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.