Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Wash. 2d 367 - Plancich v. Williamson

57 Wash. 2d 367 - Plancich v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2017

21 state decisions

60196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hughlett · In re Allen · Brotherton v. Day & Night Fuel Co. · Coles v. McNamara · Dundon v. Dundon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It should be mentioned that in the afternoon, at about two o'clock p.m., following his arrest, respondent was transferred to the Thurston County jail where he was held for two days and then released. If, contrary to the conclusion we have reached, the arrest had been wrongful, perhaps the arresting officers would be liable for all damages suffered by the lengthy duration of imprisonment. 4 Am.Jur., Arrest, § 121. However, as we have already stated, we think the arrest was made on reasonable grounds. Liability cannot attach solely because of the obviously, unduly long detention. There must be some basis for placing the responsibility for the long detention, at least to some degree, on the appellant officers. The only finding by the trial court in this respect was that "plaintiff was deprived of his liberty by reason of his arrest by defendants for a period of three days without due process of law * * *." This finding or conclusion does not place clearly on the appellants any responsibility for the period Louis actually was confined and in the custody of the county authorities. So far as the findings and the record show, appellants' responsibility with regard to respondent's arrest terminated when he was turned over to the county authorities for a mental examination."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a trial court's refusal to find a fact will not be disturbed on appeal, even though the defendant's testimony on which a finding was requested was not directly contradicted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The authority to restrain a dangerously insane person also appears to have existed at common law[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.