57 Wash. App. 21 - State v. Noltie’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2010 · most notably 116 Wash. 2d 831 - State v. Noltie (1991), Noltie v. Peterson (1993)
3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Frye v. United States · Cablevision Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc. · Reading Co. v. CJI Industries, Inc. · Fisher v. Oklahoma · 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the existence of a state of mind on the part of the juror in reference to the action, or to either party, which satisfies the court that the challenged person cannot try the issue impartially and without prejudice to the substantial rights of the party challenging[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fire“no more a `novel' device or scientific process subject to the Frye standard than binoculars or a weak microscope”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Phillips
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.