State v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1997
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 102 Wash. 2d 348 - State v. Calderon · 94 Wash. 2d 430 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Harris · 25 Wash. App. 795 - State v. Pella
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of intimidating a witness if a person directs a threat to a former witness because of the witness’ testimony in any official proceeding, or if, by use of a threat directed to a current witness or a person he has reason to believe is about to be called as a witness in any official proceeding or to a person whom he has reason to believe may have information relevant to a criminal investigation, he attempts to: (a) Influence the testimony of that person; or (b) Induce that person to elude legal process summoning him to testify; or (c) Induce that person to absent himself from such proceedings.* [ 2 ]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.