57 Wash. App. 688 - State v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 90 Wash. 2d 423 - State v. Peterson · 52 Wash. App. 380 - State v. Hunnel · Stratman v. Admiral Beverage Corp. · 45 Wash. App. 590 - State v. Bernhard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“he or she shall be arraigned within 14 days of the filing of the information; if neither condition exists, arraignment must occur within 14 days of the defendant's first appearance in superior court following the filing of the information. CrR 3.3(c)(1). Within this section of CrR 3.3, the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hardesty“Failure of a party to object as required shall be a waiver of the objection, and the date of arraignment shall be conclusively established as the date upon which the defendant was actually arraigned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chenoweth“[Counsel] need only have briefly questioned his client to acquire sufficient information to raise the objection. His failure to do so precludes a subsequent attempt to do so on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Chenoweth
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.