Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Wash. App. 765 - State v. Manchester

57 Wash. App. 765 - State v. Manchester’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2015

14 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Connecticut v. Barrett · 64 Cal. 2d 633 - People v. Anderson · Mason v. Commonwealth · State v. Hope

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person commits robbery when he unlawftilly takes personal property from the person of another or in his presence against his will by the use or threatened use of immediate force, violence, or fear of injury to that person or his property or the person or property of anyone. Such force or fear must be used to obtain or retain possession of the property, or to prevent or overcome resistance to the taking; in either of which cases the degree of force is immaterial. Such taking constitutes robbery whenever it appears that, although the taking was fully completed without the knowledge of the person from whom taken, such knowledge was prevented by the use of force or fear.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This change indicates the Legislature's intent to broaden the scope of taking, for purposes of robbery, by including violence during flight immediately following the taking.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “in this context has been defined as a taking of something”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.