Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Wash. App. 809 - State v. Scoby

57 Wash. App. 809 - State v. Scoby’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2001
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 411 (§ 16 of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913)

Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 8 Wash. App. 123 - State v. Withers · 5 Wash. App. 299 - State v. LaRue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A person is guilty of forgery if, with intent to injure or defraud:”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Written instrument" means: (a) Any paper, document, or other instrument containing written or printed matter or its equivalent; or (b) any access device, ... token, stamp, seal, badge, trademark, or other evidence or symbol of value, right, privilege, or identification[.]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “an instrument is something which, if genuine, may have legal effect or be the foundation of legal liability.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.