Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Wash. App. 921 - State v. Lewis

57 Wash. App. 921 - State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
March 2022
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2022

14 state decisions

501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · 85 Wash. 2d 758 - State v. Gosby · State v. Stalheim · 99 Wash. 2d 75 - State v. Barr · 36 Wash. App. 428 - State v. Mark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “damages resulting from mental anguish, pain and suffering, and other intangible losses”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) . . . Restitution ordered by a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable damages for injury to or loss of property, actual expenses incurred for treatment for injury to persons, and lost wages resulting from injury. Restitution shall not include reimbursement for damages for mental anguish, pain and suffering, or other intangible losses . . .. (2) Restitution may be ordered whenever the offender is convicted of an offense which results in injury to any person or damage to or loss of property. . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When restitution is ordered, the court shall determine the amount of restitution due at the sentencing hearing or within sixty days”. The Washington State Supreme Court recently held that the word”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.