Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 57 Wis. 2d 462 - Sinnott v. Porter

57 Wis. 2d 462 - Sinnott v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1981
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 35 Wis. 2d 134 - Kriesel v. Kriesel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . That rule, adhered to in Wisconsin, is as follows: “ ‘A judgment rendered by a court having jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, unless reversed or annulled in some proper proceeding, is not open to contradiction or impeachment, in respect of its validity, verity, or binding effect, by parties or privies, in any collateral action or proceeding, except . . . for fraud in its procurement.’ 49 C. J. S., Judgments, p. 792, sec. 401.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.