Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 A2D 271 - Leeks v. Leeks

Leeks v. Leeks’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1804

Relies on Hill v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners, Local 25 · Holland v. Hannan · Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Ass'n · Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A. · 2 Ill. 2d 246 - Wright v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A resulting trust does not arise where a transfer of property is made to one person and the purchase price is paid by another, if the person by whom the purchase price is paid manifests an intention that no resulting trust should arise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen a transfer of property is made to one person and the purchase price is paid by another.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.