United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently October 2013
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations · Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co · Ruhm v. Turner · In the Matter of Lloyd James Durensky, Bankrupt. United States of America v. Lloyd James Durensky · 384 F. Supp. 895 - In Re Penn Central Transportation Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“controversies arising in proceedings in bankruptcy”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“, on the other hand, are usually described as matters which arise in the course of the bankruptcy proceedings which are not mere steps in the ordinary administration of the bankrupt, but which present distinct and separable issues between the trustee and adverse claimants concerning the right and title to the bankrupt's estate. 13 Here the appellants are not seeking any part of the estate in bankruptcy. Rather, they are attempting to alter the ordinary course of the administration of Cantwell's estate. Thus, the matter appealed here is a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The differentiation between 'controversies arising in proceedings in bankruptcy' and 'proceedings in bankruptcy' is hardly pellucid.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.