Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 F.2d 899 - In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contracts Litigation. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Robert W. Adams and Western Nuclear, Inc.

In Re Westinghouse Electric Corporation Uranium Contracts Litigation. Westinghouse Electric Corporation v. Robert W. Adams and Western Nuclear, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

570 F.2d 899 · 1978

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably State v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (1978), Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (2004)

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

90197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. · Griffin v. California · Marroso v. United States · Covey Oil Company, Valley Oil Company, Frank Ferguson, Fred Smith and Jack Wiles v. Continental Oil Company and Texaco, Inc., Pyramid Oil Company, Premium Oil Company and Quality Oil Company v. Continental Oil Company and Texaco, Inc., Slim Olson, Inc. v. Continental Oil Company and Texaco, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court may relieve a party from an improvident [discovery stipulation] or one that might work injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.