Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 F.2d 920 - Robinson v. Benson

Robinson v. Benson’s Empirical Analysis

570 F.2d 920 · 1978

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably State ex rel. Hickman v. Capots (1989), Frazier v. Dubois (1990)

17 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

14019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Wolff v. McDonnell · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Meachum v. Fano · Mack v. McCune

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here Robinson was provided with notice .of the charges against him, where Robinson was represented by a staff member at both parole rescission hearings, where Robinson was given access to the Parole Board’s files in his case, where Robinson’s wife was present at the final hearing, and where there is sufficient support for the Board’s decision to rescind Robinson’s parole, Robinson’s due process rights in this context were not violated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As a result of the setting of Robinson’s parole date, Robinson had more than a mere anticipation of freedom, but rather a concrete expectation contingent upon continued good behavior. Thus, Robinson was certainly entitled to minimum due process procedures.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all that is required is that the evidence and facts reasonably demonstrate that the person's conduct has been as good as required by the terms and conditions of the release....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.