Winter v. FloorPro, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The recommendations of the Procurement Commission specifically exclude bringing subcontractors under the provisions of [the Act].... By administering its procurement through a single point of contact, the Government’s job is made both simpler and cheaper. The single point of contact approach also helps suppress frivolous claims.... By forcing the prime contractor to administer its subcontractor network, the Government permits prime contractors and subcontractors at all tiers to use to some extent their familiar commercial procedures in contract award and administration----Finally, by denying the subcontractors direct access to administrative remedies, the Government is forcing the prime contractor and the subcontractor to negotiate their disputes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. United States

2. “[T]he provisions of the CDA apply only to 'contractors,’ ” Winter v. FloorPro, Inc., 570 F.3d 1367 , 1370 (Fed.Cir.2009), and”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Atterbury v. United States Marshals Service