Pole v. Randolph’s Empirical Analysis
570 F.3d 922 · 2009
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Everroad v. Scott Truck Systems, Inc. (2010), Fednav International Ltd. v. Continental Insurance (2010)
32 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Pearson v. Callahan · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Colorado v. Connelly · Caldwell v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim—(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bolton v. Akpore“marijuana blunt” is a cigar that has been hollowed out and refilled with marijuana. See Pole v. Randolph, 570 F.3d 922 , 945 n. 10 (7th Cir.2009). A”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“must assert his federal claim through one complete round of state court review, either on direct review or in post-conviction proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McGhee v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.