570 F. Supp. 2d 556 - Lloyd v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) a deprivation that is ‘sufficiently serious,’ i.e., a deprivation that presents a ‘condition of urgency, one that may produce death, degeneration, or extreme pain,’ Hathaway v. Coughlin, 37 F.3d 63, 66 (2d Cir.1994) (quoting Nance v. Kelly, 912 F.2d 605, 607 (2d Cir.1990) (Pratt, J., dissenting)), and (2) reckless indifference, that is, ‘defendants were aware of plaintiffs serious medical needs and consciously disregarded a substantial risk of serious harm[,]’ Singleton v. Perilli, No. 03 Civ. 2271(DC), 2004 WL 74238 , at (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2004).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 710 F. Supp. 2d 248 - Dzwonczyk v. Syracuse City Police Department

2. “A reasonable jury could infer deliberate indifference from the failure of the doctors to take further steps to see that [plaintiff] was given an MRI [after those doctors ordered the test].”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Singletary v. Russo

3. “acted with a mental state more blameworthy than negligence,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Singletary v. Russo