State v. Blank’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 2019
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Haines · Parrish v. Denato · Earnest v. State · Hrbek v. State · State v. Van Hoff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] defendant challenging a restitution order entered as part of the original sentence has two options: to file a petition in district court under section 910.7, or to file a direct appeal.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“At any time during the period of probation, parole, or incarceration, the offender ... may petition the court on any matter related to the plan of restitution or restitution plan of payment and the court shall grant a hearing if on the face of the petition it appears that a hearing is warranted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“demonstrate a claim of hardship, inadequate income, or a change in income, expenses, or other circumstances sufficient to warrant a hearing. Iowa Code § 910.7 (offender, or another associated with the restitution plan, may petition for modification). However, with respect to the constitutionality of the restitution award,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Izzolena
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.