Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 P2D 692 - McLane v. McLane

McLane v. McLane’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 2011

5 state decisions

2019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sampsell v. Superior Court · Wallace v. Wallace · Thomas v. Thomas · Cody v. Cody · 19 Utah 2d 267 - Scott v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even though the decree is res judicata as to circumstances existing at the time of the decree, if there are changed circumstances so requiring, there can be a further adjudication thereon.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.