Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 SO2D 1067 - Badillo v. Hill

Badillo v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 476 So. 2d 671 - Marquez v. State · 281 So. 2d 1 - Kluger v. White · 23 Cal. 2d 840 - Valencia v. Shell Oil Co. · 60 Wash. 2d 421 - Holmes v. Raffo · Hoffman v. All Star Insurance Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[l]oss of use damages have been allowed for a period of time much longer than the time span during which repairs could or should have been made, because the plaintiff tried to effect the repairs, but due to his financial circumstances, he was unable to do so”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.