Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

570 So. 2d 1112

State v. Vignone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 6, 1990

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1990-12-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1995

1 state decisions

Relies on 464 So. 2d 552 - Vetrick v. Hollander · 460 So. 2d 440 - State v. Robinson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The trial court granted appellee’s motion to suppress because it found that the confidential informant’s reliability had not been sufficiently established by the sheriff. We reverse. When an informant is not a confidential informant and gives his own independent affidavit in support of the warrant, it is not incumbent upon the police to establish his reliability. See State v. Robinson, 460 So.2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984), cert. dismissed, 464 So.2d 555 (Fla.1985).

¶2*1113REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.
/570/so2d/1112 · .json · Public domain