Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 So. 2d 360 - Smith v. Bartlett

570 So. 2d 360 - Smith v. Bartlett’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2011

7 state decisions

60199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kemble v. United States · 458 So. 2d 269 - Florida Bar v. Johnson · 257 So. 2d 242 - State v. Gazda · 56 So. 2d 536 - Weathers v. State · Delta Truck Brokers, Inc. v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The conviction of a defendant for an offense involving the act giving rise to restitution under this section shall estop the defendant from denying the essential allegations of that offense in any subsequent civil proceeding.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he term "conviction" means a determination of guilt by verdict of the jury or by plea of guilty, and does not require adjudication by the court. It is important to distinguish a "judgment of conviction" which is defective unless it contains an adjudication of guilt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “one who pleads guilty or is found guilty by a jury has been `convicted' under the provisions of section 775.089(8), even in the absence of an adjudication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.