Willis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
June 1997
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona · Hance v. Georgia · 364 So. 2d 397 - Jacks v. State · 475 So. 2d 609 - Ex Parte Bell · Garner v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The test for determining whether a witness is an accomplice is whether he or she could have been indicted and convicted for the offense charged, either as principal or accessory.' Ex parte Dial , 387 So.2d 879 , 881 (Ala. 1980), quoting Russell v. State , 365 So.2d 343 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978). See also Ex parte Bates , 461 So.2d 5 ,6 (Ala. 1984); Brownlee, supra , 545 So.2d at 160 ; Jacks, supra , 364 So.2d at 401 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bone v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.