Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 SO2D 780 - Hagedorn v. State

Hagedorn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 456 So. 2d 1156 - Reeves v. State · 519 So. 2d 591 - State v. Drewry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““First, there must be a defendant who has been found guilty or who has pleaded guilty to a trafficking offense. Second, the district attorney must have filed a motion under § 20-2-81(b), requesting that the sentencing court reduce or suspend the defendant’s sentence because of his having rendered assistance which the district attorney has determined to be ‘substantial assistance.’ Third, the sentencing court must itself find, before applying the provisions of § 20-2-81(b), that the assistance rendered was in fact ‘substantial assistance.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.