Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 570 So. 2d 820 - Midell v. State

570 So. 2d 820 - Midell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Meeks v. Florida · Duffy v. State · Watson v. State · 420 So. 2d 812 - Harris v. State · Black v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Evidence tending merely to impeach or contradict a State witness as to the testimony given upon the trial is generally not such newly discovered evidence as would warrant the granting of a new trial.' Dossey v. State, 489 So.2d 662, 666 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.