Salinas v. Texas’s Empirical Analysis
570 U.S. 178 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 2025 · most notably State v. Orr (2019), 387 Wis. 2d 333 - Waukesha Cnty. v. S.L.L. (In Re Mental Commitment of S.L.L.) (2019)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 16 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Florida v. Royer · Griffin v. California · Doyle v. Ohio · Berkemer v. McCarty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Before petitioner could rely on the privilege against self-incrimination, he was required to invoke it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[F]orfeiture of the privilege against self-incrimination need not be knowing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.