Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 571 A2D 677 - In Re SG

In Re SG’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
4
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2021

11 state decisions

501990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re RL · In re R.B. · In re J. M. · In Re JM · In Re MB

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he issue in juvenile proceedings is not whether the parent did a particular act or acted in conformity with a particular character trait but instead whether the child has proper care and his or her well-being is protected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`indicative of a broad pattern of abuse and neglect generally pervasive in this household and clearly relevant to R.M.,'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “unique to juvenile proceedings because of the breadth of the inquiry and focus on the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.